🆚 IcoFont vs. Simple Line Icons
- 📈 Simple Line Icons is much more popular than IcoFont.
- 🌎 Simple Line Icons is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Italy.
- 🌍 IcoFont is more popular in Rwanda and Somalia.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Icon library
Icon library
About
IcoFont is a collection of 2400+ open source icons.
Simple Line Icons is an open-source icon library with CSS, SASS, LESS and web font files.
Headquarters
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Simple Line Icons library is 8 times more popular than IcoFont.
Total websites
Market share
Icons
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Simple Line Icons is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Italy, while IcoFont is more popular in Rwanda and Somalia.
United States
Germany
Italy
India
Spain
France
United Kingdom
Brazil
Australia
Poland
Awards
- ⭐ 8th most popular in China in the Icons category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Thailand in the Icons category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Hong Kong in the Icons category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Hungary in the Icons category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Bangladesh in the Icons category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Germany in the Icons category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Italy in the Icons category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Spain in the Icons category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in France in the Icons category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Icons category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Simple Line Icons is more popular than IcoFont in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Travel
Entertainment
Sports
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.