🆚 Ionic vs. Xojo

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Frontend framework
Frontend framework

About

Ionic is an open-source UI toolkit and framework for building native-quality apps for iOS, Android, and the web using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

It provides over 100 pre-designed UI components, built-in adaptive styling, native device access via Capacitor, hardware-accelerated transitions, dark mode, and tree-shakable builds.

Xojo is a cross-platform programming language and development environment for building native applications for macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android, the web, and Raspberry Pi.

Headquarters

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free version ❌
Single platform: macOS$99
Windows$99
Web$399
Mobile$399
Desktop (all desktop platforms)$399
Pro (all platforms)$799
Pro Plus$1,999

Categories

Frontend Frameworks › Rank #21
Frontend Frameworks › Rank #49

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Ionic frontend framework is 128 times more popular than Xojo.
Total websites

Market share

Frontend Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Ionic is more popular than Xojo in all countries.
United States
Germany
India
France
Canada
Italy
Japan
Spain
Brazil
Russia

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Ionic is more popular than Xojo in all market segments.
Online Shopping
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Entertainment
Fashion/Beauty
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Restaurants
Finance/Banking

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#1,765
#3,892
#6,832
View more ➝
Name
Rank

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.