🆚 Joomla vs. Prismic

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Content management system
Content management system

About

Joomla is an open-source content management system written in PHP.

It offers a flexible extension system with over 4,000 extensions, a template-driven architecture, access control levels, built-in multilingual support, and tools for content versioning and SEO management.

Prismic is a headless CMS and page builder for Next.js, Nuxt, and SvelteKit sites.

It offers Slices, which are reusable page sections defined in code and editable via a visual page builder, along with localization, version history, REST and GraphQL APIs, live previews, scheduled content releases, a built-in media library, and image optimization.

Headquarters

New York, United States
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free version ✔️
Medium$180/month
Platinum$750/month
EnterpriseCustom

Categories

CMS › Rank #2
CMS › Rank #27

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Joomla CMS is 26 times more popular than Prismic.
Total websites

Market share

CMS

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Joomla is more popular in Germany, the United States, and Italy, while Prismic is more popular in Iceland.
Germany
United States
Italy
United Kingdom
Russia
Poland
France
Spain
Netherlands
Greece

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Joomla is more popular than Prismic in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Travel
Internet Services
Online Shopping
Health
Sports
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#1,768
#2,099
#3,364
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.