🆚 jQuery vs. Raphael
- 📈 jQuery is much more popular than Raphael.
- 🌍 jQuery is more popular in all countries.
jQuery
RaphaelType
About
jQuery is a fast, small, feature-rich 
JavaScript library designed to simplify 
HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, event handling, 
CSS animations, and Ajax.
It provides a cross-browser selector engine, formerly known as Sizzle, supports deferred and promise objects for asynchronous workflows, has built-in 
JSON parsing and utility functions, and allows extensibility through a large ecosystem of plugins.
Raphaël is a JavaScript vector library for manipulating SVG graphics.
It supports SVG and VML rendering, path drawing, animations, transformations, drag-and-drop interactions, custom attributes, and DOM event handling, and serves as the graphics foundation for libraries such as gRaphaël and 
Morris.js.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in Nepal in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 107th most popular in Spain in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 112nd most popular in Italy in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 116th most popular in France in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 120th most popular in Greece in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Raphael
OpenJS Foundation company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.