🆚 Juicer vs. SnapWidget
- 📈 SnapWidget is noticeably more popular than Juicer.
- 🌍 SnapWidget is more popular in Japan, Korea, and France.
- 🌎 Juicer is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Finland.
Juicer
SnapWidgetType
About
Juicer is a social media aggregator that allows users to display content from over 15 social media channels in a customizable feed on their website.
It provides a social wall that aggregates posts by hashtag or account name into a single feed, AI-powered moderation with custom rules written in plain English, and a builder for link-in-bio pages and campaign microsites.
SnapWidget is a social media widget service that embeds live feeds from 
Instagram, 
Facebook, 
X, 
TikTok, and 
YouTube into a website and updates them automatically.
It offers multiple display layouts including grids, slideshows, scrolling rows, and popups, hashtag campaigns that display user-generated posts, shoppable images that link photos to product pages, and custom 
CSS styling.
Headquarters
Pricing
(3 sources) $15/month
(5 sources) $25/month
(30 sources) $99/month
(1 Pro widget) $8/month
(20 Pro widgets) $14/month
(250 Pro widgets) $99/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Finland in the Social Widgets category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Switzerland in the Social Widgets category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in Germany in the Social Widgets category.
- 🔥 16th most popular in Australia in the Social Widgets category.
- 🔥 18th most popular in the United States in the Social Widgets category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Korea in the Social Widgets category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Japan in the Social Widgets category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Brazil in the Social Widgets category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Sweden in the Social Widgets category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,001,723 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.