🆚 K2 vs. Sanity
- 📈 Sanity is slightly more popular than K2.
- 🌎 Sanity is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Norway.
- 🌍 K2 is more popular in Italy, Spain, and Germany.
K2
SanityType
About
K2 is a 
Joomla content management extension that replaces and extends the default article system with a structured content framework.
It provides extended item forms with fields for images, videos, galleries, and file attachments, nested categories, tagging, comments with spam filtering, a built-in media manager, and automatic resizing of uploaded images into six configurable sizes.
Sanity is a cloud-based headless CMS that stores content as structured data in a hosted content lake and delivers it via APIs to any frontend.
It features a customizable open-source editing Studio built with 
React, real-time collaboration support, its own query language for 
JSON called GROQ (Graph-Relational Object Queries) alongside 
GraphQL, an asset pipeline with image transformations, versioning, localization, and enterprise capabilities such as SSO and role-based access.
Headquarters
Pricing
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Greece in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Hungary in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Italy in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Spain in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Poland in the CMS category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Norway in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Australia in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Sweden in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in India in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in New Zealand in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,009,087 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.