🆚 K2 vs. Volcanic
- 📈 K2 is much more popular than Volcanic.
- 🌍 K2 is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Volcanic is particularly popular in the United Kingdom.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
K2 is a Joomla content management extension that replaces and extends the default article system with a structured content framework.
It provides extended item forms with fields for images, videos, galleries, and file attachments, nested categories, tagging, comments with spam filtering, a built-in media manager, and automatic resizing of uploaded images into six configurable sizes.
Volcanic is a platform and CMS built for recruitment marketers.
Headquarters
Victoria, Mahe, Seychelles
Loughborough, United Kingdom
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The K2 CMS platform is 30 times more popular than Volcanic.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
K2 is more popular than Volcanic in all countries.
Italy
Russia
Greece
Spain
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
Poland
France
Ukraine
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Greece in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Hungary in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Italy in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Spain in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Poland in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 40th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
K2 is more popular among sites focused on business, education and reference, and marketing and merchandising, while Volcanic is more commonly used on job search sites.
Business
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Travel
General News
Entertainment
Health
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,001,723 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
K2