🆚 Kestrel vs. Roxen
- 📈 Kestrel is much more popular than Roxen.
- 🌍 Kestrel is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Web server
Web server
About
Kestrel is an open-source, cross-platform web server for ASP.NET Core that can serve HTTP requests on
Windows,
Linux, and macOS.
It uses an event-driven, high-performance architecture to handle many concurrent connections, supports HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, HTTP/3, and
WebSockets, provides HTTPS support, and integrates closely with the ASP.NET Core middleware pipeline and configuration system.
Roxen is an open-source web server developed by the Swedish company Roxen AB.
Headquarters
Redmond, Washington, United States
Linköping, Sweden
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Web Servers › Rank #8
Web Servers › Rank #37
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Kestrel web server is 772 times more popular than Roxen.
Total websites
Market share
Web Servers
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Kestrel is more popular than Roxen in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Brazil
Netherlands
China
Germany
Italy
Denmark
Sweden
India
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Turkey in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the United States in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in China in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Brazil in the Web Servers category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Kestrel is more popular than Roxen in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Motor Vehicles
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Software/Hardware
Travel
Entertainment
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Roxen