🆚 Kestrel vs. Warp
- 📈 Kestrel is much more popular than Warp.
- 🌍 Kestrel is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Web server
Web server
About
Kestrel is an open-source, cross-platform web server for ASP.NET Core that can serve HTTP requests on
Windows,
Linux, and macOS.
It uses an event-driven, high-performance architecture to handle many concurrent connections, supports HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, HTTP/3, and
WebSockets, provides HTTPS support, and integrates closely with the ASP.NET Core middleware pipeline and configuration system.
Warp is a fast and lightweight web server for Haskell Web Application Interface (WAI) applications.
Headquarters
Redmond, Washington, United States
Israel
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Web Servers › Rank #11
Web Servers › Rank #41
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Kestrel web server is 1,015 times more popular than Warp.
Total websites
Market share
Web Servers
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Kestrel is more popular than Warp in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Brazil
Germany
Italy
Sweden
Turkey
Australia
India
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Georgia in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Turkey in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Iran in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Brazil in the Web Servers category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Kestrel is more popular than Warp in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Motor Vehicles
Education/Reference
Software/Hardware
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Sports
Travel
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Apache