🆚 Kong Gateway vs. Swagger
- 📈 Swagger is much more popular than Kong Gateway.
- 🌎 Swagger is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 Kong Gateway is more popular in China, Russia, and Thailand.
Type
About
Kong Gateway is an API gateway that manages, secures, and routes API traffic using a cloud-native, platform-agnostic architecture.
It provides request proxying, routing, load balancing, health checks, authentication, rate limiting, and observability features, and can be extended through plugins written in Lua, Go, or JavaScript.
Swagger is a suite of open-source tools built around the
OpenAPI Specification that enables developers to design, build, and document REST APIs through a standardized, machine- and human-readable interface.
It supports OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, and JSON Schema and includes components such as Swagger Editor for writing and validating API definitions with real-time feedback, Swagger UI for generating interactive documentation, and Swagger Codegen for producing client SDKs and server stubs.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Russia in the Load Balancers category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in China in the Load Balancers category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Germany in the Load Balancers category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Brazil in the Load Balancers category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in China in the Tools category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Build Tools category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the Netherlands in the Build Tools category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Denmark in the Build Tools category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Chile in the Build Tools category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Romania in the Build Tools category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Gulp
Grunt