🆚 Kontent.ai vs. Plate
- 📈 Kontent.ai is much more popular than Plate.
- 🌎 Kontent.ai is more popular in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Plate is more popular in the Netherlands.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
Kontent.ai is a headless CMS that provides reusable modular content blocks, semantic search, and SDKs to deliver structured content via APIs to any digital channel.
It also offers versioning, content scheduling, collaboration tools, workflows, and AI-assisted features like content generation, copy checks, automated taxonomy suggestions, and localization.
Plate is a Dutch cloud content management system with multi-site support.
Headquarters
Brno, Czech Republic
Pricing
Free version ❌
Custom
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Kontent.ai CMS is 6 times more popular than Plate.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Kontent.ai is more popular in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom, while Plate is more popular in the Netherlands.
Netherlands
United States
Australia
United Kingdom
Switzerland
Belgium
Ireland
New Zealand
Czech Republic
Italy
Awards
- ⬆️ 26th most popular in Australia in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 41st most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 69th most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 32nd most popular in the Netherlands in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Kontent.ai is more popular than Plate in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Health
Online Shopping
Finance/Banking
Education/Reference
Sports
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Travel
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Contentful
Sanity
Amplience
CoreMedia🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.