🆚 Less.js vs. Prefix-free
- 📈 Less.js is much more popular than Prefix-free.
- 🌎 Less.js is more popular in the United States, the Czech Republic, and Russia.
- 🌍 Prefix-free is more popular in Korea and Iran.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Less.js
Prefix-freeType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Less.js is a 
JavaScript library that converts Less styles to 
CSS styles.
A legacy script that adds browser prefixes to CSS code when needed for old browsers.
Headquarters
Switzerland
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Less.js JavaScript library is 7 times more popular than Prefix-free.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Less.js is more popular in the United States, the Czech Republic, and Russia, while Prefix-free is more popular in Korea and Iran.
United States
Czech Republic
Russia
Germany
United Kingdom
France
Spain
Italy
Netherlands
Japan
Awards
- 🔥 18th most popular in Iceland in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🔥 19th most popular in the Czech Republic in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 36th most popular in Slovakia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 42nd most popular in Russia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 45th most popular in Belarus in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in Iran in the Legacy category.
- 🔥 17th most popular in Korea in the Legacy category.
- 🔥 17th most popular in China in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 29th most popular in Russia in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 34th most popular in Japan in the Legacy category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Less.js is more popular than Prefix-free in all market segments.
Sports
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Travel
Internet Services
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
General News
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.