๐ LibreSSL vs. WebDAV
- ๐ WebDAV is much more popular than LibreSSL.
- ๐ WebDAV is more popular in Japan, the United States, and Korea.
- ๐ LibreSSL is more popular in Denmark.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
WebDAVType
Web server module
Web server module
About
LibreSSL is a fork of OpenSSL 1.0.1g developed to modernize the codebase and improve security.
The WebDAV (Web-based Distributed Authoring and Versioning) module allows users to collaboratively edit and manage files on remote web servers.
Headquarters
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Wilmington, Delaware, United States
Pricing
Free โ๏ธ Open source
Categories
Web Server Modules โบ Rank #17
Web Server Modules โบ Rank #5
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
WebDAV technology is 28 times more popular than LibreSSL.
Total websites
Market share
Web Server Modules
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
WebDAV is more popular in Japan, the United States, and Korea, while LibreSSL is more popular in Denmark.
Japan
United States
Korea
Hong Kong
Germany
Spain
France
United Kingdom
Italy
Russia
Awards
- ๐ฅ Second most popular in Japan in the Web Server Modules category.
- ๐ฅ Third most popular in Hong Kong in the Web Server Modules category.
- โญ 4th most popular in Korea in the Web Server Modules category.
- โญ 5th most popular in Germany in the Web Server Modules category.
- โญ 5th most popular in Spain in the Web Server Modules category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
WebDAV is more popular than LibreSSL in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Travel
Art/Culture/Heritage
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
๐๏ธ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,873,854 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.