🆚 LiteSpeed Cache for WordPress vs. Swift Performance
- 📈 LiteSpeed Cache for WordPress is much more popular than Swift Performance.
- 🌍 LiteSpeed Cache for WordPress is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
LiteSpeed Cache for WordPressType
Caching solution
Caching solution
About
LiteSpeed Cache for 
WordPress is an open-source site acceleration plugin that provides optimization tools and server-level caching for WordPress sites.
It includes image optimization, minification of 
CSS, 
JavaScript, and 
HTML, lazy loading, and object cache support.
Swift Performance is a WordPress caching plugin that includes page caching, CSS and JavaScript optimization, DB optimizer and plugin organizer.
Headquarters
Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, United States
Ujlengyel, Pest, Hungary
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free version ✔️ Lite, open source
$49.99/year
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The LiteSpeed Cache for WordPress caching solution is 112 times more popular than Swift Performance.
Total websites
Market share
Caching
WordPress Plugins
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
LiteSpeed Cache for WordPress is more popular than Swift Performance in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Brazil
Spain
India
Poland
Netherlands
France
Australia
Italy
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Poland in the Caching category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Turkey in the Caching category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Indonesia in the Caching category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Romania in the Caching category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Lithuania in the Caching category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
LiteSpeed Cache for WordPress is more popular than Swift Performance in all market segments.
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Travel
General News
Entertainment
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.