🆚 LiteSpeed Cache vs. Squid
- 📈 LiteSpeed Cache is much more popular than Squid.
- 🌍 LiteSpeed Cache is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Squid is particularly popular in Japan.
Statistics based on 3.4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Caching
Caching
About
LiteSpeed Cache is a server-side caching solution designed specifically for LiteSpeed web servers, available as a plugin for WordPress,
Drupal,
Joomla,
Magento,
Shopware, etc.
Squid is a caching proxy for the web that supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and more.
Headquarters
Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, United States
Westminster, Colorado, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Requires LiteSpeed Web Server or QUIC.cloud CDN
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The LiteSpeed Cache caching is 432 times more popular than Squid.
Total websites
Market share
Caching
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
LiteSpeed Cache is more popular than Squid in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
India
Brazil
Spain
Australia
Netherlands
Turkey
France
Poland
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in India in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Brazil in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Caching category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Japan in the Load Balancers category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in Japan in the Caching category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in Germany in the Load Balancers category.
- 🔥 17th most popular in the United States in the Load Balancers category.
- 🔥 20th most popular in Germany in the Caching category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
LiteSpeed Cache is more popular than Squid in all market segments.
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Entertainment
General News
Travel
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
LiteSpeed Cache
WP Super Cache
Apache Traffic Server