🆚 LiteSpeed Cache vs. Varnish
- 📈 LiteSpeed Cache is twice as popular as Varnish.
- 🌎 LiteSpeed Cache is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France.
- 🌍 Varnish is more popular in Germany, Denmark, and Sweden.
Type
About
LiteSpeed Cache is a server-side caching solution designed specifically for LiteSpeed web servers, available as a plugin for
WordPress,
Drupal,
Joomla,
Magento,
Shopware, etc.
Varnish Cache is an open-source HTTP accelerator and reverse caching proxy that caches content from web servers to reduce load times, and supports native TLS termination and Kubernetes deployments.
It uses the VCL configuration language compiled to native C code, serves cached responses in three system calls, provides official container images and a Helm chart for Kubernetes, outputs structured JSON logs, and supports VMOD extension modules.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Brazil in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in India in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Spain in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Caching category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Denmark in the Load Balancers category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,813,555 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
LiteSpeed Cache




