π LiteSpeed Web Server vs. OpenResty
- π LiteSpeed Web Server is five times more popular than OpenResty.
- π LiteSpeed Web Server is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia.
- π OpenResty is more popular in China, Korea, and Russia.
Type
About
LiteSpeed Web Server is a high-performance commercial web server that can operate as a drop-in replacement for
Apache, using the same configuration files and control panel integrations.
It uses an event-driven architecture to handle thousands of concurrent connections with low resource usage, supports HTTP/2, HTTP/3, and
QUIC, includes built-in server-level caching through
LSCache, and provides security features such as anti-DDoS protection and ModSecurity compatibility.
OpenResty is an Nginx distribution that bundles the LuaJIT interpreter to run Lua scripts directly inside the web server.
It embeds Lua, a lightweight scripting language, into Nginx's event-driven architecture, enabling high-performance dynamic request handling, asynchronous I/O, API and microservice development, traffic control, caching, authentication, and logging.
Headquarters
Pricing
(1 domain, up to 2GB RAM)Free βοΈ
(5 domains, up to 8GB RAM)$10/month
(5 domains, unlimited RAM)$16/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- π₯ Most popular in Australia in the Web Servers category.
- π₯ Most popular in Indonesia in the Web Servers category.
- π₯ Most popular in Turkey in the Web Servers category.
- π₯ Most popular in Vietnam in the Web Servers category.
- π₯ Most popular in Romania in the Web Servers category.
- π₯ Second most popular in Samoa in the Web Servers category.
- π₯ Third most popular in Korea in the Web Servers category.
- π₯ Third most popular in Russia in the Web Servers category.
- π₯ Third most popular in Slovakia in the Web Servers category.
- π₯ Third most popular in Seychelles in the Web Servers category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
ποΈ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,367,747 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Tengine