🆚 Lity vs. PhotoSwipe
- 📈 PhotoSwipe is three times more popular than Lity.
- 🌎 PhotoSwipe is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Lity is more popular in Luxembourg, Senegal, and Belize.
PhotoSwipeType
About
Lity is an ultra-lightweight, accessible and responsive lightbox plugin that supports images, iframes and inline content out of the box.
PhotoSwipe is a modular 
JavaScript image gallery and lightbox library for displaying responsive image collections with interactive viewing features.
It supports responsive images, zooming, panning, touch gestures, keyboard navigation, fullscreen viewing, customizable UI controls, and galleries created from 
HTML elements, external data, or dynamically generated image collections.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 41st most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 58th most popular in Canada in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 59th most popular in France in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 59th most popular in Spain in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 62nd most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in Israel in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 24th most popular in Uzbekistan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 32nd most popular in Colombia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 32nd most popular in Sri Lanka in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 33rd most popular in South Africa in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Fancyapps
Lightbox
LightGallery🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,603,958 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.