🆚 Locomotive vs. Mastodon CMS

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Content management system
Content management system

About

Locomotive CMS is an open-source content management system built on Ruby and MongoDB.

Mastodon is free, open-source software for running self-hosted, federated social networking services based on the ActivityPub protocol.

It allows users to host independent “instances” that communicate across the global “Fediverse,” supports up to 500-character posts (toots), images, video, audio, polls, local and federated timelines, chronological feeds with no ads or algorithms, and community-based moderation.

Headquarters

Toulouse, France
Berlin, Germany

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️Open source
Hosted Personal$19/month
Freelancer$39/month
Agency$79/month
Enterpsrise$199/month
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

CMS › Rank #266
CMS › Rank #59

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Mastodon CMS is 69 times more popular than Locomotive.
Total websites

Market share

CMS

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Mastodon CMS is more popular than Locomotive in all countries.
Germany
France
United States
Portugal
United Kingdom
Japan
Netherlands
Finland
Canada
Austria

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Mastodon CMS is more popular than Locomotive in all market segments.
Social Networking
Business
Content Server
Internet Services
Entertainment
Marketing/Merchandising
Sports
Games
Potentially Unwanted Programs
Software/Hardware

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#2,030,834
#3,363,190
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#35,763
#148,953
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.