🆚 Lume vs. Sphinx
- 📈 Sphinx is much more popular than Lume.
- 🌎 Sphinx is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Lume is more popular in Spain.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Static site generator
Static site generator
About
Lume is a fast and flexible static site generator built with Deno.
Sphinx is an open-source documentation generator originally created for the Python ecosystem that converts reStructuredText and Markdown sources into structured technical documentation.
It supports cross-references, automatic API documentation for Python, C++,
JS, and other software domains, theming, and deployments to
Read the Docs,
GitHub Pages,
GitLab Pages, and
Netlify.
Headquarters
Germany
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Static Site Generators › Rank #31
Static Site Generators › Rank #8
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Sphinx static site generator is 26 times more popular than Lume.
Total websites
Market share
Static Site Generators
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Sphinx is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom, while Lume is more popular in Spain.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Netherlands
France
Japan
Switzerland
Canada
Sweden
Spain
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Sphinx is more popular than Lume in all market segments.
Software/Hardware
Technical Information
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Business
Technical/Business Forums
Blogs/Wiki
Shareware/Freeware
Job Search
Personal Pages
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

