🆚 Meilisearch vs. Pagefind
- 📈 Meilisearch is noticeably more popular than Pagefind.
- 🌍 Meilisearch is more popular in Germany, France, and Portugal.
- 🌎 Pagefind is more popular in the United States, Japan, and China.
Meilisearch
PagefindType
About
Meilisearch is an open-source AI-powered hybrid search engine for applications and websites that combines keyword-based and vector-based search to retrieve results using both lexical matching and semantic similarity.
It provides a REST API and client libraries for multiple programming languages, supports full-text search with typo tolerance, synonyms, faceted filtering, customizable sorting, and vector embeddings for semantic search.
Pagefind is a fully static 
JavaScript search library that aims to perform well on large sites while using as little bandwidth as possible.
Headquarters
Pricing
(100K documents, 50K searches)$30+/month
(1M documents, 250K searches)$300+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Portugal in the Site Search category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Belgium in the Site Search category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in France in the Site Search category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Germany in the Site Search category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in the United States in the Site Search category.
- 🔥 17th most popular in Germany in the Site Search category.
- 🔥 18th most popular in the United States in the Site Search category.
- ⬆️ 233rd most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 242nd most popular in Germany in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Algolia
Solr
Elasticsearch
Site Search 360
Flexsearch
CloudCannon company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,795 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.