🆚 MemberSuite vs. WP-Members
- 📈 WP-Members is much more popular than MemberSuite.
- 🌍 WP-Members is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Membership management software
Membership management software
About
MemberSuite is a customizable association management software (AMS) designed for nonprofit organizations.
WP-Members is a free WordPress membership plugin with content restriction, user login, custom registration fields, user profiles.
Headquarters
Nisswa, Minnesota, United States
Washington, Georgia, United States
Pricing
Free version ❌
Custom
Free version ✔️Open source
Priority support$59/year
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The WP-Members membership management software is 30 times more popular than MemberSuite.
Total websites
Market share
Membership Management
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
WP-Members is more popular than MemberSuite in all countries.
Japan
United States
France
Germany
United Kingdom
Italy
Korea
Netherlands
Australia
Spain
Awards
- 🔥 16th most popular in the United States in the Membership Management category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Korea in the Membership Management category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the Membership Management category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in France in the Membership Management category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Italy in the Membership Management category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the Netherlands in the Membership Management category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
WP-Members is more popular than MemberSuite in all market segments.
Business
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Health
Sports
Travel
Internet Services
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
WP-Members
Wild Apricot
ClubExpress
ProfilePress