🆚 Messenger Customer Chat vs. Naver Post

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Legacy technology
Legacy technology

About

Messenger Customer Chat is the website chat widget from Meta that was retired in May 2024.

Naver Post was a South Korean mobile-optimized user-generated content platform that let creators publish and share expert posts on various topics before it was discontinued in April 2025, after 12 years of service.

It focused on mobile publishing with subscriptions and content discovery, and provided tools for migrating posts and subscription data to Naver Blog as part of the shutdown process.

Headquarters

Menlo Park, California, United States
Seongnam, Korea

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️

Categories

Legacy › Rank #14
Legacy › Rank #57

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

Messenger Customer Chat legacy technology is 24 times more popular than Naver Post.
Total websites

Market share

Legacy

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Messenger Customer Chat is more popular than Naver Post in all countries.
Korea
Vietnam
United States
Poland
Thailand
Australia
Hungary
United Kingdom
Taiwan
France

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Messenger Customer Chat is more popular among sites focused on online shopping, business, and marketing and merchandising, while Naver Post is more commonly used on general news sites.
Online Shopping
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Travel
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Fashion/Beauty
Blogs/Wiki
Real Estate
Health

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#10,089
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#6,434
#7,615
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.