🆚 Milligram vs. Pico CSS
- 📈 Pico CSS is slightly more popular than Milligram.
- 🌎 Pico CSS is more popular in the United States, Germany, and France.
- 🌍 Milligram is more popular in Indonesia, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
User interface framework
User interface framework
About
Milligram is a minimalist CSS framework (only 2kb gzipped).
Headquarters
Brazil
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
UI Frameworks › Rank #47
UI Frameworks › Rank #44
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Pico CSS UI framework is 1.1 times more popular than Milligram.
Total websites
Market share
UI Frameworks
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Pico CSS is more popular in the United States, Germany, and France, while Milligram is more popular in Indonesia, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
Indonesia
United Kingdom
United States
Germany
Japan
France
Italy
China
Netherlands
India
Awards
- 🔥 15th most popular in Indonesia in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⬆️ 27th most popular in the United Kingdom in the UI Frameworks category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Pico CSS is more popular among sites focused on Internet services, personal pages, and blogs and wiki, while Milligram is more commonly used on business, art, culture and heritage, and education and reference sites.
Business
Internet Services
Art/Culture/Heritage
Education/Reference
Personal Pages
Blogs/Wiki
Technical Information
Media Downloads
Software/Hardware
Travel
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,795 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.