🆚 MkDocs vs. Scully
- 📈 MkDocs is five times more popular than Scully.
- 🌎 MkDocs is more popular in the United States, Germany, and France.
- 🌎 Scully is more popular in Thailand, India, and Mexico.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
MkDocsType
Static site generator
Static site generator
About
MkDocs is an open-source static site generator for building project documentation from 
Markdown files with a simple configuration-driven workflow.
It uses a single 
YAML configuration file to define navigation and site settings, includes a built-in development server with live reloading, supports theming and plugins, and provides one-command deployment to 
GitHub Pages.
Scully is a static site generator for 
Angular projects looking to embrace the Jamstack.
Headquarters
Brighton, United Kingdom
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Static Site Generators › Rank #6
Static Site Generators › Rank #19
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The MkDocs static site generator is 5 times more popular than Scully.
Total websites
Market share
Static Site Generators
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
MkDocs is more popular in the United States, Germany, and France, while Scully is more popular in Thailand, India, and Mexico.
United States
Germany
France
United Kingdom
Russia
Netherlands
Brazil
Canada
Sweden
Switzerland
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
MkDocs is more popular among sites focused on software and hardware, Internet services, and technical information, while Scully is more commonly used on business, online shopping, and finance and banking sites.
Business
Software/Hardware
Internet Services
Technical Information
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Technical/Business Forums
Online Shopping
Finance/Banking
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Docusaurus
GitBook
VitePress🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.