🆚 mod_apreq2 vs. mod_fcgid
- 📈 mod_fcgid is much more popular than mod_apreq2.
- 🌎 mod_fcgid is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the Netherlands.
- 🌍 mod_apreq2 is more popular in Tunisia.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Web server module
Web server module
About
mod_apreq2 is an Apache HTTP Server filter module that connects the libapreq2 request parsing library into the server.
It provides the APREQ2 input filter so parsed HTTP cookies, query strings, and POST data from the libapreq2 library are available in every request phase.
mod_fcgid is a FastCGI module for the Apache HTTP Server.
Headquarters
Wilmington, Delaware, United States
Wilmington, Delaware, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Web Server Modules › Rank #15
Web Server Modules › Rank #3
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The mod_fcgid web server module is 30 times more popular than mod_apreq2.
Total websites
Market share
Web Server Modules
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
mod_fcgid is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the Netherlands, while mod_apreq2 is more popular in Tunisia.
United States
Germany
Netherlands
Russia
Japan
Italy
China
Denmark
Czech Republic
Spain
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the Netherlands in the Web Server Modules category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in China in the Web Server Modules category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Denmark in the Web Server Modules category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the Czech Republic in the Web Server Modules category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Taiwan in the Web Server Modules category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
mod_fcgid is more popular than mod_apreq2 in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Entertainment
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Public Information
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,873,854 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
mod_apreq2