🆚 mod_rpaf vs. OpenSSL
OpenSSL is much more popular than mod_rpaf.- OpenSSL is more popular in Japan, the United States, and Germany.
mod_rpaf is more popular in Tajikistan.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Web server module
Web server module
About
mod_rpaf is an Apache module that restores the original client IP address when Apache runs behind a reverse proxy by rewriting REMOTE_ADDR based on X-Forwarded-For headers.
OpenSSL is an open-source software library that provides strong encryption using the SSL and TLS protocols.
Headquarters
Newark, Delaware, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Web Server Modules › Rank #16
Web Server Modules › Rank #1
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The OpenSSL web server module is 301 times more popular than mod_rpaf.
Total websites
Market share
Web Server Modules
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
OpenSSL is more popular in Japan, the United States, and Germany, while mod_rpaf is more popular in Tajikistan.
Japan
United States
Germany
Korea
United Kingdom
Italy
Netherlands
Spain
Russia
Czechia
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Russia in the Web Server Modules category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Web Server Modules category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Web Server Modules category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Web Server Modules category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Korea in the Web Server Modules category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Web Server Modules category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
OpenSSL is more popular than mod_rpaf in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Entertainment
Travel
Software/Hardware
Health
Blogs/Wiki
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,046,631 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.