🆚 Modern Campus vs. Plate
- 📈 Modern Campus is much more popular than Plate.
- 🌎 Modern Campus is more popular in the United States.
- 🌍 Plate is more popular in the Netherlands and Belgium.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Modern CampusType
Content management system
Content management system
About
Modern Campus CMS is a cloud-based content management system designed specifically for higher education institutions to manage complex, multi-department websites.
It features a low-code visual editor with templates, decentralized workflows with role-based permissions, automated accessibility checks aligned with 
WCAG standards, and a personalization engine that delivers targeted content based on user behavior.
Plate is a Dutch cloud content management system with multi-site support.
Headquarters
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Pricing
Free version ❌
On request
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Modern Campus CMS is 9 times more popular than Plate.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Modern Campus is more popular in the United States, while Plate is more popular in the Netherlands and Belgium.
United States
Netherlands
Belgium
Austria
China
Georgia
Germany
Greece
Guam
Uzbekistan
Awards
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 32nd most popular in the Netherlands in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Modern Campus is more popular among sites focused on education and reference, and business, while Plate is more commonly used on marketing and merchandising sites.
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Business
Forum/Bulletin Boards
Entertainment
Sports
Recreation/Hobbies
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Internet Services
Online Shopping
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Terminalfour
Cascade CMS
Contentful
Sanity
Amplience🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.