🆚 Movable Type vs. Z-BlogPHP
- 📈 Z-BlogPHP is three times more popular than Movable Type.
- 🌍 Z-BlogPHP is more popular in China, Cambodia, and Hong Kong.
- 🌎 Movable Type is more popular in Japan, the United States, and Canada.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Z-BlogPHPType
Content management system
Content management system
About
Movable Type is a weblog publishing system written in Perl.
Z-BlogPHP is a Chinese open-source blogging and content management system developed using 
PHP.
It provides a customizable theme and template engine, supports MySQL, 
PostgreSQL, and 
SQLite databases, offers a built-in marketplace for themes and plugins, and includes a comment system, tagging, and 
RSS feeds support.
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Xiangyang, Hubei, China
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Z-BlogPHP CMS platform is 2.8 times more popular than Movable Type.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Z-BlogPHP is more popular in China, Cambodia, and Hong Kong, while Movable Type is more popular in Japan, the United States, and Canada.
China
Japan
Cambodia
Hong Kong
United States
Singapore
Philippines
Canada
South Africa
India
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Japan in the Blogging Platforms category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Japan in the CMS category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Cambodia in the CMS category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in China in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Z-BlogPHP is more popular among sites focused on blogs and wiki, business, and Internet services, while Movable Type is more commonly used on entertainment, online shopping, and personal pages sites.
Blogs/Wiki
Business
Entertainment
Internet Services
Health
Forum/Bulletin Boards
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Personal Pages
Alcohol
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,001,723 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.