πŸ†š MudBlazor vs. Radzen Blazor

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

User interface framework
User interface framework

About

MudBlazor is an open-source Blazor component library based on Material Design principles that provides developers with reusable UI elements for building modern web applications in C#.

It includes a comprehensive set of responsive components such as tables, dialogs, forms, navigation elements, and grids, supports both Blazor Server and WebAssembly, and offers built-in theming and customization with minimal JavaScript dependency.

Radzen Blazor is an open-source UI component library for the Blazor framework that provides native C# components with full theming support for both Material Design and Fluent UI design systems.

It includes over 100 responsive components such as data grids, charts, schedulers, navigation and form elements, supports Blazor Server and WebAssembly, and provides built-in theming, accessibility features, RTL support, and data binding.

Headquarters

Γ–rebro, Sweden
Sofia, Bulgaria

Website

Pricing

Free βœ”οΈOpen source
Free βœ”οΈOpen source

Categories

UI Frameworks β€Ί Rank #54
UI Frameworks β€Ί Rank #52

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Radzen Blazor UI framework is 1.1 times more popular than MudBlazor.
Total websites

Market share

UI Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Radzen Blazor is more popular in the United States, the Netherlands, and Russia, while MudBlazor is more popular in France, Iran, and South Africa.
United States
Netherlands
Russia
Sweden
France
Brazil
Germany
Italy
Canada
Iran

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Radzen Blazor is more popular than MudBlazor in all market segments.
Internet Services
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Public Information
Education/Reference
Motor Vehicles
Politics/Opinion
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Entertainment
Real Estate

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#34,285
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#126,698
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.