🆚 Namo WebEditor vs. WYSIWYG Web Builder
- 📈 Namo WebEditor is slightly more popular than WYSIWYG Web Builder.
- 🌍 Namo WebEditor is more popular in Korea, Germany, and France.
- 🌎 WYSIWYG Web Builder is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Italy.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
HTML editor
HTML editor
About
Namo WebEditor is a legacy WYSIWYG HTML editor that was discontinued in 2011.
Headquarters
Korea
Anderson, Texas, United States
Website
Pricing
Free version ❌
$59.95
Plus (includes all extension packs)$99.95
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Namo WebEditor technology is 1.1 times more popular than WYSIWYG Web Builder.
Total websites
Market share
HTML Editors
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Namo WebEditor is more popular in Korea, Germany, and France, while WYSIWYG Web Builder is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Italy.
United States
Korea
Germany
United Kingdom
Italy
France
Netherlands
Russia
Hungary
Switzerland
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Korea in the HTML Editors category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Germany in the HTML Editors category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in Korea in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 60th most popular in Germany in the Legacy category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in the United States in the HTML Editors category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Namo WebEditor is more popular among sites focused on recreation and hobbies, education and reference, and travel, while WYSIWYG Web Builder is more commonly used on marketing and merchandising, entertainment, and business sites.
Marketing/Merchandising
Entertainment
Recreation/Hobbies
Education/Reference
Business
Health
Personal Pages
Public Information
Travel
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Namo WebEditor