🆚 Next.js vs. Quasar

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *
Next.js
Quasar

Type

Frontend framework
Frontend framework

About

Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications that offers server-side rendering, static site generation, file-based routing, and built-in API routes.

It also supports incremental static regeneration (ISR) to update static pages without full rebuilds, automatic image optimization, fast refresh during development, and built-in TypeScript support.

Quasar is an open-source framework based on Vue.js that lets developers build responsive websites, PWA, SSR, mobile, and desktop applications from a single codebase.

It offers over 70 customizable UI components, automatic tree-shaking, integrated platform detection, support for Cordova and Capacitor for mobile, Electron for desktop, built-in CLI tools with hot-reload, theming, RTL support, and multiple build modes such as SPA, SSR, PWA, and BEX.

Headquarters

San Francisco, California, United States
Bucharest, Romania

Website

nextjs.org #64,544
quasar.dev #595,914

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Frontend Frameworks › Rank #3
Frontend Frameworks › Rank #20
Backend Frameworks › Rank #4
UI Frameworks › Rank #30

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Next.js frontend framework is 92 times more popular than Quasar.
Total websites

Market share

Frontend Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Next.js is more popular than Quasar in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
India
Brazil
France
Netherlands
Japan
Russia
Australia

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Next.js is more popular than Quasar in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Travel
Entertainment
Education/Reference
General News
Finance/Banking
Software/Hardware

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#16
#23
#47
#56
#61
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#2,197
#3,591
#4,076
#4,859
#21,498
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.