🆚 Ninja Framework vs. Struts

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Backend framework
Backend framework

About

Ninja is a full-stack web framework for Java designed for rapid development and scalability.

It integrates technologies like Guice, JPA, Flyway, and Maven, supports RESTful APIs, HTML rendering, form validation, and offers tools for testing, deployment, and cloud hosting.

Apache Struts is an open-source MVC framework for creating modern Java web applications.

It features a plugin architecture supporting REST, AJAX, and JSON, a robust interceptor stack, POJO-based actions, simplified configuration through XML scanning, custom tag libraries, and modular extensions.

Headquarters

Wilmington, Delaware, United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Backend Frameworks › Rank #55
Backend Frameworks › Rank #16

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Struts backend framework is 184 times more popular than Ninja Framework.
Total websites

Market share

Backend Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Struts is more popular than Ninja Framework in all countries.
Korea
United States
China
Japan
United Kingdom
Germany
Hong Kong
India
Spain
France

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Struts is more popular than Ninja Framework in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Government/Military
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Finance/Banking
Internet Services
Travel
Software/Hardware
Health

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#49,012
#55,043
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#1,356
#1,707
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.