🆚 Open edX vs. Sensei LMS
- 📈 Sensei LMS is much more popular than Open edX.
- 🌍 Sensei LMS is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Open edX is particularly popular in France.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Sensei LMSType
Learning management system
Learning management system
About
Open edX is an open-source service-oriented platform for authoring and delivering online learning at any scale.
Sensei LMS is a learning management plugin by Automattic that offers easy course editor, certificate creator, export/import, and 
WooCommerce integration.
Headquarters
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
San Francisco, California, United States
Pricing
Free version ✔️Open source
Interactive Blocks$60/year
Sensei Pro$180/year
Sensei Agency (20 sites)$360/year
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Sensei LMS is 17 times more popular than Open edX.
Total websites
Market share
LMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Sensei LMS is more popular than Open edX in all countries.
United States
Spain
United Kingdom
France
Poland
Australia
Germany
Canada
India
Japan
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Spain in the LMS category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the United Kingdom in the LMS category.
- ⬆️ 103rd most popular in Spain in the WordPress Plugins category.
- ⬆️ 144th most popular in the United States in the WordPress Plugins category.
- ⬆️ 150th most popular in the United Kingdom in the WordPress Plugins category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Sensei LMS is more popular than Open edX in all market segments.
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Business
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Health
Religion/Ideology
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Recreation/Hobbies
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
LearnDash
Canvas LMS
LifterLMS
MasterStudy LMS🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,524,018 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.