🆚 Open Journal Systems vs. XOOPS
- 📈 Open Journal Systems is five times more popular than XOOPS.
- 🌎 Open Journal Systems is more popular in the United States, Indonesia, and Germany.
- 🌍 XOOPS is more popular in Japan, Taiwan, and China.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
Open Journal Systems is open source software for the management of peer-reviewed academic journals.
PHPHeadquarters
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Open Journal Systems CMS is 5 times more popular than XOOPS.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Open Journal Systems is more popular in the United States, Indonesia, and Germany, while XOOPS is more popular in Japan, Taiwan, and China.
United States
Indonesia
Japan
Germany
Canada
Brazil
India
Spain
Ukraine
Taiwan
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Indonesia in the CMS category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Pakistan in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in India in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Singapore in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Brazil in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Taiwan in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Japan in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 50th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Open Journal Systems is more popular among sites focused on education and reference, business, and health, while XOOPS is more commonly used on entertainment, blogs and wiki, and forum, bulletin boards sites.
Education/Reference
Business
Health
Marketing/Merchandising
General News
Entertainment
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Blogs/Wiki
Forum/Bulletin Boards
Technical Information
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Modern Campus
Terminalfour
Cascade CMS
WordPress
Joomla
Drupal
Contao
Concrete CMS🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.