🆚 OpenCms vs. Sitepark IES
- 📈 OpenCms is much more popular than Sitepark IES.
- 🌍 OpenCms is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Sitepark IES is particularly popular in Germany.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
OpenCmsType
Content management system
Content management system
About
OpenCms is an open-source 
Java-based content management system that uses 
XML for structured content.
It provides drag-and-drop page editing, XML content templates, versioning, multilingual content management, full-text search, a sitemap editor, and a virtual file system that stores all content inside a database.
Sitepark Information Enterprise Server is a German content management system.
Headquarters
Cologne, Germany
Münster, Germany
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The OpenCms platform is 9 times more popular than Sitepark IES.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
OpenCms is more popular than Sitepark IES in all countries.
Germany
Spain
Italy
Czech Republic
Switzerland
Russia
China
Brazil
Taiwan
Greece
Awards
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Spain in the CMS category.
- 🔥 16th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
- 🔥 19th most popular in Italy in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 43rd most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
OpenCms is more popular among sites focused on government and military, education and reference, and finance and banking, while Sitepark IES is more commonly used on public information sites.
Public Information
Government/Military
Education/Reference
Finance/Banking
Business
Travel
Motor Vehicles
Major Global Religions
Portal Sites
Marketing/Merchandising
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.