🆚 Oracle HTTP Server vs. Phusion Passenger
- 📈 Phusion Passenger is much more popular than Oracle HTTP Server.
- 🌍 Phusion Passenger is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.6M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Web server
Web server
About
Oracle HTTP Server (OHS) is a web server component for Oracle Fusion Middleware, based on the open-source Apache HTTP Server.
It extends Apache with Oracle-developed modules to support Single Sign-On, clustered high availability, proxying for Oracle WebLogic Server, and support for Perl, PHP, Ruby, and Python through FastCGI.
Headquarters
Austin, Texas, United States
Apeldoorn, Netherlands
Pricing
Free version ✔️ Open source
Passenger Enterprise $43.32+/month
Categories
Web Servers › Rank #35
Web Servers › Rank #12
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Phusion Passenger web server is 130 times more popular than Oracle HTTP Server.
Total websites
Market share
Web Servers
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Phusion Passenger is more popular than Oracle HTTP Server in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Canada
Japan
France
Russia
Spain
Poland
Netherlands
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Japan in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Ukraine in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Germany in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Canada in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in France in the Web Servers category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Phusion Passenger is more popular than Oracle HTTP Server in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Sports
Travel
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

Apache
GlassFish