🆚 Oracle Traffic Director vs. Sucuri CloudProxy
Sucuri CloudProxy is much more popular than Oracle Traffic Director.- Sucuri CloudProxy is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Oracle Traffic DirectorType
Load balancer
Web application firewall
About
Oracle Traffic Director is a high-throughput, low-latency layer-7 software load balancer for load balancing HTTP/S and TCP traffic to the application tier.
Sucuri CloudProxy is a website application firewall that stops bad actors, speeds up load times, and increases website availability.
Headquarters
Austin, Texas, United States
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Sucuri CloudProxy WAF technology is 4,732 times more popular than Oracle Traffic Director.
Total websites
Market share
Load Balancers
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Sucuri CloudProxy is more popular than Oracle Traffic Director in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Canada
India
Australia
Italy
Germany
Ireland
Brazil
Spain
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the WAF category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the WAF category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Ireland in the WAF category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Arab Emirates in the WAF category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Mexico in the WAF category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Sucuri CloudProxy is more popular than Oracle Traffic Director in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Health
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Entertainment
Internet Services
Travel
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,047,231 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.