🆚 Oracle Traffic Director vs. Sucuri CloudProxy
- 📈 Sucuri CloudProxy is much more popular than Oracle Traffic Director.
- 🌍 Sucuri CloudProxy is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Oracle Traffic Director is particularly popular in Spain.
Statistics based on 3.4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Load balancer
Load balancer
About
Oracle Traffic Director is a high-throughput, low-latency layer-7 software load balancer for load balancing HTTP/S and TCP traffic to the application tier.
Sucuri CloudProxy is a website application firewall that stops bad actors, speeds up load times, and increases website availability.
Headquarters
Austin, Texas, United States
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Categories
Load Balancers › Rank #18
Load Balancers › Rank #7
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Sucuri CloudProxy load balancer is 2,800 times more popular than Oracle Traffic Director.
Total websites
Market share
Load Balancers
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Sucuri CloudProxy is more popular than Oracle Traffic Director in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Canada
India
Australia
Italy
Germany
Ireland
Spain
Brazil
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Sri Lanka in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Libya in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United States in the Load Balancers category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in India in the Load Balancers category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Ireland in the Load Balancers category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Sucuri CloudProxy is more popular than Oracle Traffic Director in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Health
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Internet Services
Entertainment
Travel
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
F5 BIG-IP