🆚 Oracle Traffic Director vs. Varnish
- 📈 Varnish is much more popular than Oracle Traffic Director.
- 🌍 Varnish is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Oracle Traffic Director is particularly popular in Spain.
Statistics based on 3.4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Oracle Traffic DirectorType
Load balancer
Caching
About
Oracle Traffic Director is a high-throughput, low-latency layer-7 software load balancer for load balancing HTTP/S and TCP traffic to the application tier.
Varnish Cache is an open-source web application accelerator, also known as a caching HTTP reverse proxy.
Headquarters
Austin, Texas, United States
Stockholm, Sweden
Pricing
Free version ✔️Open source
Varnish Pro$1,500+/year
Varnish EnterpriseCustom
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Varnish caching is 16,736 times more popular than Oracle Traffic Director.
Total websites
Market share
Load Balancers
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Varnish is more popular than Oracle Traffic Director in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
France
Germany
Denmark
Sweden
Netherlands
Norway
Belgium
Italy
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Denmark in the Load Balancers category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Varnish is more popular than Oracle Traffic Director in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
General News
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Marketing/Merchandising
Sports
Internet Services
Travel
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Google Cloud Load Balancer
AWS Elastic Load Balancer
F5 BIG-IP
Envoy
Nginx
Apache Traffic Server🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.