🆚 PhotoShelter vs. Pimcore
- 📈 Pimcore is five times more popular than PhotoShelter.
- 🌍 Pimcore is more popular in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.
- 🌎 PhotoShelter is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada.
PhotoShelter
PimcoreType
About
PhotoShelter is an American digital asset management and content distribution platform that enables organizations to store, organize, and deliver visual media through a centralized cloud-based library.
It features AI-powered visual search with auto-tagging and similarity detection, collaborative workspaces with permission-based access, analytics on asset usage and search activity, and integrations with Adobe Creative Cloud, 
Canva, 
Figma, and 
Sketch.
Pimcore is an open-source enterprise platform that includes PIM, CDP, DAM, DXP/CMS, and digital commerce.
It provides a centralized data model with object inheritance, classification stores for product attributes, automated digital asset transformations, configurable data import and export pipelines, and API-first content delivery through 
GraphQL and REST APIs.
Headquarters
Pricing
(on-premises) $9,900/year
(on-premises) $29,900/year
(platform-as-a-service) $39,900+/year
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United States in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the PIM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Austria in the PIM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Austria in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Switzerland in the PIM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the PIM category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Cloudinary
Acquia DAM
Brandfolder
Bynder
Canto
Adobe Experience Manager
Craft
CoreMedia
Storyblok🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.