🆚 Picnic CSS vs. Skeleton
- 📈 Skeleton is twice as popular as Picnic CSS.
- 🌎 Skeleton is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada.
- 🌍 Picnic CSS is more popular in Spain, Japan, and the Netherlands.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
User interface framework
User interface framework
About
Picnic CSS is a lighweight CSS library with nice defaults and many plugins to kickstart your projects.
Headquarters
Austin, Texas, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
UI Frameworks › Rank #58
UI Frameworks › Rank #51
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Skeleton UI framework is 2.3 times more popular than Picnic CSS.
Total websites
Market share
UI Frameworks
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Skeleton is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada, while Picnic CSS is more popular in Spain, Japan, and the Netherlands.
United States
Spain
United Kingdom
Canada
France
Singapore
Japan
Netherlands
Taiwan
Vietnam
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Skeleton is more popular among sites focused on business, blogs and wiki, and software and hardware, while Picnic CSS is more commonly used on education and reference, and Internet services sites.
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Marketing/Merchandising
Software/Hardware
Online Shopping
Personal Pages
Fashion/Beauty
Public Information
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.