🆚 Picturefill vs. Regenerator
- 📈 Regenerator is much more popular than Picturefill.
- 🌍 Regenerator is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
A responsive image polyfill for <picture>, srcset, sizes, and more.
Regenerator is a JavaScript library from
Facebook that allows the use of ES6 generators in older browsers.
Headquarters
Menlo Park, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Regenerator JavaScript library is 8 times more popular than Picturefill.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Regenerator is more popular than Picturefill in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Japan
Germany
Australia
Spain
Italy
France
Netherlands
Brazil
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Estonia in the Legacy category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Switzerland in the Legacy category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Portugal in the Legacy category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Germany in the Legacy category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Sweden in the Legacy category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Australia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Thailand in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Vietnam in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Israel in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Regenerator is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and blogs and wiki, while Picturefill is more commonly used on real estate sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Travel
Health
Entertainment
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Picturefill
Regenerator
Babel