🆚 Popper vs. Prism
- 📈 Popper is much more popular than Prism.
- 🌎 Popper is more popular in the United States, India, and Germany.
- 🌍 Prism is more popular in Saint Helena.
Popper
PrismType
About
Popper is an open-source 
JavaScript library for positioning and displaying floating UI elements such as tooltips, popovers, and dropdowns.
It calculates the placement of these elements relative to a reference element using a modifier-based architecture, supports automatic flipping and overflow prevention, and has been superseded by 
Floating UI.
Prism is a lightweight, extensible syntax highlighter designed for fast client-side code highlighting in web pages and documentation systems.
It supports nearly 300 languages and includes plugins covering line numbering, line highlighting, automatic linking, code folding, copy-to-clipboard buttons, and customizable language definitions.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Rwanda in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Nepal in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Jordan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Qatar in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Mongolia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 64th most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 73rd most popular in China in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 83rd most popular in Taiwan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 96th most popular in Singapore in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 103rd most popular in Korea in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.