🆚 Power Pages vs. Wappler
- 📈 Power Pages is slightly more popular than Wappler.
- 🌍 Power Pages is more popular in the United Kingdom, Australia, and the Netherlands.
- 🌎 Wappler is more popular in the United States, Switzerland, and Spain.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Power PagesType
Website builder
Build tool
About
Microsoft Power Pages is an enterprise-grade, low-code website builder.
Wappler is a low-code software development platform that allows users to visually build responsive websites, mobile and desktop apps with no vendor lock-ins and complete hosting freedom.
Headquarters
Redmond, Washington, United States
Enschede, Netherlands
Pricing
Free version ❌
500 visitors$75/month
100 authenticated visitors$200/month
Free version ❌Free 14-day trial
Basic
Educational€19/month
Individuals€29/month
Business€49/month
Enterprise€69/month
Pro
Educational€29/month
Individuals€49/month
Business€79/month
Enterprise€109/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Power Pages website builder is 1.2 times more popular than Wappler.
Total websites
Market share
Website Builders
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Power Pages is more popular in the United Kingdom, Australia, and the Netherlands, while Wappler is more popular in the United States, Switzerland, and Spain.
United States
United Kingdom
Australia
Switzerland
Netherlands
Spain
South Africa
France
Germany
Kenya
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Wappler is more popular than Power Pages in all market segments.
Business
Internet Services
Marketing/Merchandising
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Public Information
Health
Finance/Banking
Government/Military
Religion/Ideology
Interactive Web Applications
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Oracle APEX🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.