🆚 Pure CSS vs. UIKit

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

User interface framework
User interface framework

About

Pure CSS is a lightweight, responsive CSS framework developed by Yahoo for building fast and minimal web interfaces.

It provides a responsive grid system and basic styles for forms, buttons, tables, and menus. It is modular, with the entire set of modules under 4 KB when minified and gzipped.

UIkit is a lightweight and modular front-end framework.

It includes more than 30 reusable components such as modals, tooltips, accordions, navigation menus and sliders, a responsive fluid grid, and supports theme customization via Sass or Less.

Headquarters

New York, United States
Hamburg, Germany

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

UI Frameworks › Rank #16
UI Frameworks › Rank #6

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

UIKit technology is 12 times more popular than Pure CSS.
Total websites

Market share

UI Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

UIKit is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom, while Pure CSS is more popular in Lithuania.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Italy
Spain
France
Netherlands
Russia
Brazil
Switzerland

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

UIKit is more popular than Pure CSS in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Online Shopping
Travel
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki
Health
Software/Hardware

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#6,105
View more ➝
Name
Rank
fapello.com
#389
#1,156
#1,445
#1,888
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.