🆚 Qrator vs. Servicepipe
- 📈 Qrator is three times more popular than Servicepipe.
- 🌍 Qrator is more popular in Russia, Kazakhstan, and the Czech Republic.
- 🌍 Servicepipe is more popular in Belarus.
Statistics based on 3.4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Bot mitigation tool
Bot mitigation tool
About
Qrator is a company of Russian origin that offers cloud-based Web Application Firewall (WAF) and DDoS protection services. Its solutions include advanced DNS security, Layer 7 DDoS mitigation, and comprehensive cybersecurity for data protection.
Servicepipe is a Russian cybersecurity company that offers protection services for IT infrastructure and web resources, including DDoS mitigation, bot defense, and traffic filtering for L3 to L7 threats.
Headquarters
Prague, Czech Republic
Moscow, Russia
Pricing
Free version ❌
23,000 RUB/month
Free version ❌
Custom
Categories
Bot Mitigation › Rank #7
Bot Mitigation › Rank #12
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Qrator bot mitigation tool is 3 times more popular than Servicepipe.
Total websites
Market share
Bot Mitigation
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Qrator is more popular in Russia, Kazakhstan, and the Czech Republic, while Servicepipe is more popular in Belarus.
Russia
Kazakhstan
Czech Republic
Cyprus
Belarus
United Arab Emirates
United States
Germany
Netherlands
Azerbaijan
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Russia in the Bot Mitigation category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Russia in the Bot Mitigation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Qrator is more popular among sites focused on business, online shopping, and marketing and merchandising, while Servicepipe is more commonly used on sports, portal sites, and public information sites.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
General News
Internet Services
Finance/Banking
Travel
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,431,368 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.