🆚 qTranslate-X vs. TranslatePress
- 📈 TranslatePress is four times more popular than qTranslate-X.
- 🌎 TranslatePress is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Spain.
- 🌍 qTranslate-X is more popular in Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Belarus.
Type
About
qTranslate-X is a discontinued WordPress plugin used for managing dynamic multilingual content on websites.
TranslatePress is a WordPress translation plugin that lets site owners create multilingual websites by translating all content directly from a front-end visual interface.
It allows front-end translation of entire pages, supports dynamic strings (gettext) and shortcodes for conditional content based on language, works with any theme or plugin, integrates with Google Translate and
DeepL for automatic translation, and offers customizable language switchers.
Headquarters
Pricing
(1 site, 50K AI translated words) €99/year
(3 sites, 200K AI translated words) €199/year
(unlimited sites, 500K AI translated words) €349/year
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Ukraine in the Translation category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Italy in the Translation category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Brazil in the Translation category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Poland in the Translation category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Vietnam in the Translation category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Malaysia in the Translation category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Greece in the Translation category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in China in the Translation category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Belgium in the Translation category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Hungary in the Translation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.