🆚 Quarto vs. Zola

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Static site generator
Static site generator

About

Quarto is an open-source scientific and technical publishing system based on Markdown that allows users to write in plain-text Markdown or work with Jupyter notebooks and embed executable code in Python, R, Julia, or Observable JS.

It supports Pandoc-style Markdown with equations, citations, cross-references, figure panels, and advanced layout, and renders a single source into formats such as HTML, PDF, MS Word, ePub, presentations, websites, blogs, or books.

Zola is a fast static site generator written in Rust.

Headquarters

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Static Site Generators › Rank #17
Static Site Generators › Rank #24
Data Science › Rank #2

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Quarto static site generator is 4 times more popular than Zola.
Total websites

Market share

Static Site Generators

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Quarto is more popular than Zola in all countries.
United States
France
United Kingdom
Germany
Australia
Japan
Netherlands
Switzerland
India
Canada

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Quarto is more popular than Zola in all market segments.
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Technical Information
Technical/Business Forums
Business
Internet Services
Marketing/Merchandising
Health
Real Estate
Sports

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#18,928
#30,448
#55,725
#69,209
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#459,502
#663,746
#706,955
#831,034
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.