🆚 ReadMe vs. Scalar

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Static site generator
Tool

About

ReadMe is a cloud-based documentation platform that helps teams create, publish, and manage interactive API documentation hubs.

It provides a WYSIWYG and MDX (Markdown eXtended) editor with versioning and Git sync, interactive API references where developers can test endpoints and see live responses, built-in AI tools for writing and linting, customizable components and themes, and changelogs and guides.

Scalar is an open-source platform for creating API documentation with an interactive playground, built around the OpenAPI standard.

It provides interactive documentation that doubles as a full-featured API client, a fully offline-first REST API client, a versioned API registry with Git sync, type-safe SDK generation for multiple languages, and extensive theming and customization options.

Headquarters

San Francisco, California, United States
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️3 published versions, no custom domain or forum
Plans
Startup$99/month
Business$399/month
Enterprise$3,000+/month
Ask AI
(an AI assistant)
$150
Free version ✔️1 user
Pro$24/seat/month
EnterpriseCustom

Categories

Static Site Generators › Rank #12
Static Site Generators › Rank #30
Tools › Rank #54

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The ReadMe static site generator is 30 times more popular than Scalar.
Total websites

Market share

Static Site Generators

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

ReadMe is more popular than Scalar in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Brazil
France
Germany
Australia
Japan
Greece
Austria

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Content Server
Religion/Ideology
Information Security

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.