🆚 Redis vs. RocksDB
- 📈 Redis is much more popular than RocksDB.
- 🌍 Redis is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Database
Database
About
Redis is a popular high-performance in-memory key-value database that persists on disk.
It supports rich data structures beyond simple strings, offers master-replica replication, clustering across up to thousands of nodes via hash-slot sharding, and automatic failover.
RocksDB is an embeddable, persistent key-value store that is optimized for fast, low-latency storage, such as flash drives and high-speed disk drives.
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Menlo Park, California, United States
Pricing
Free version ✔️ Open source
Cloud Essentials $5+/month
Cloud Pro $0.881/hour
Free ✔️ Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Redis database is 3,985 times more popular than RocksDB.
Total websites
Market share
Databases
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Redis is more popular than RocksDB in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Australia
Canada
Germany
India
France
Japan
Netherlands
Italy
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Canada in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Germany in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in India in the Databases category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Redis is more popular than RocksDB in all market segments.
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Fashion/Beauty
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Sports
Entertainment
Health
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
RocksDB
